As the Fund-of-Funds (FoF) industry continues to evolve, so too must the service providers including the custodians and administrators that support it.
In recent years, there has been a distinct trend away from the traditional Hedge FoF towards closed-ended, Private Equity FoF structures. There are several reasons for this, including structural fee differences and the underlying investments themselves.
However, FoF custodians were more commonly associated with Hedge FoF’s and typically disregarded in the PE world. The exception being the SEC’s Rule 206 requirement that funds not individually audited in a timely manner utilise a third-party custodian. Credit facility providers also demanded independent custodians for Hedge FoF’s, not so for closed ended structures.
Setting aside custody and the legal title discussion, the underlying function and services are reasonably similar for both Hedge and PE FoF. There is substantial subscription paperwork and AML documentation required by underlying admins and, of course, the facilitating and accounting for wire payments. And where gathering valuations has been a time-intensive, manual task in the past, there are now numerous technology offerings that can efficiently capture capital calls and PCap/NAV statements and translate the data into an API file for processing. Managers of FoF’s – like most asset managers – have limited human capital resources and are seeking to streamline their back-office operations as much as possible. This allows their talent to be dedicated to areas like investment research, manager selection and strategy development.
Thus, FoF managers are focused on reducing overhead costs and improving the scalability of their strategies. In order to achieve these goals, they should consider partnering with a service provider with deep expertise, cutting edge technology, human capital bench strength, and the responsiveness necessary to close transactions accurately and timely.